|

DETAILED DESCRIPTION
Shortcoming of Tail Rotor Anti Torque Helicopters
A. Tail rotor anti-torque helicopters need a small tail rotor to balance the torque generated by the main rotor system. However, the tail rotor does not produce lift , but dragging over 1/ 3 of engine power and consumes 1/ 3 extra fuel burned for anti torque that dose not contribute to lift nor forward flight.
B. Bigger and heavier engine is required to power up a helicopter to offset the 1/ 3 power wasted. And larger fuel tank is needed. Both issues significantly drop the helicopter payload, and make the payload operation cost higher.
C. Tail rotor helicopters use multiple large mass blade grips, blade holders and low aerodynamic efficiency radius length fixed airfoil rotor blades in its rotor assembly. That makes the helicopter burden excessive weight to take off and flight. It further lower efficiency, and takes much fuel consumption.
D. The tail rotor produces drag and blasting noise due to spinning at 2000-3000 high speed RPM, approximately X 7 times of the main rotor RPM. Such high RPM makes the blade tip spinning near the speed of sound, produces turbulence and lousy noise.
E. Slow forward flight. comparing other type of aircrafts. During high-speed forward flight, the tail rotor produces a cylindrical airflow perpendicular to forward flight. The large dimensions of the tail rotor assembly and the perpendicular airflow generated by the tail rotor become significant barriers to high-speed forward flight, and not avoidable.
F. No back up for mechanical fails or engine fail. The helicopter have to do emergency instant auto-rotation landing. What about salvage on water surface ? fire fighting on a burning mountain or sloping mountain ? fighting on enemy control area ? No auto-rotation landing is allowed.
G. Therefore, the total efficiency of tail rotor helicopters are extremely poor. Thus, tail rotor helicopters are not good for interstates flight, not even mention coast to coast flight, efficiency and high fuel consumption.
H. There is only one main rotor producing lift, therefore all the helicopter weight (and loads) single point suspends below this main rotor. From a physics point of view, a single point hook-up compared to a dual point hook-up is less stable, and more prone to swing and oscillate.
Therefore, upgrading the single lift rotor to dual lift counter rotation twin rotors will significantly enhance stability efficiency.
Shortcoming of Gyroplanes and Gyro-crafts
A typical gyroplane is powered by a pusher prop. The gyroplane rotor obtains head wind mill to make auto rotation. There is no swash-plate nor pitch control rods on its top rotor. The gyroplane rotorcrafts have some advantage features over common tail rotor helicopters: Efficient, simple, cost effective, less vibration, long cycle life, low fuel burn, less maintenance. However,
· Gyroplanes are not VOTL type. They need short runway to take off and landing. They are STOL type ;
· Gyroplanes are not able to hover nor levitating;
· Gyroplanes carry little payload, usually only 1 or 2 seats;
· Gyroplanes engine is too close to pilot, almost right behind the pilot seat. Thus, engine noise and vibration is significant, despite no pitch cyclic retrieving heavy striking vibration on its top rotor.
Is there possible to combine the great features of both tail rotor helicopters and gyroplane together and eliminate their shortcomings ? The novel Fail Safe Multi Rotors VTOL Compound Heli-Gyro Copter shorted naming as the Heli-Gyro Copter gives the answers.
Basic on the twin top rotor type, the Heli-Gyro Copter has 2 different versions. Version 1 applies common 3 or 4 blades rotor system on its twin top rotors. Version 2 applies novel anti deforming variable airfoil diameter rotary wings on its twin top rotors, also named as the Diameter Rotary Wings Compound Heli-Linn Copter. |